|
|
Post by LazyBoy on Jun 10, 2005 22:39:41 GMT
if you were on the jury what would you say. i reckon he's guilty, but then i just plain don't like the guy :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Renegade on Jun 10, 2005 22:41:57 GMT
I like his music, but I think he's guilty.
|
|
Terry
New Member
Posts: 13
|
Post by Terry on Jun 10, 2005 22:42:14 GMT
I'd say guilty..He looks like a chimo (child molester) in the first place  I really want him to go to jail...Seeing as this isn't even the first case of molestation against him, both cases are probably true |
|
|
|
Post by Glamorous Toxic™ on Jun 10, 2005 22:47:32 GMT
I think hes guilty 100% and should be in jail. I watched a thing on him on E! and they talked about all the boys he had over and stuff, its rather odd. I hope the court doesn't find him innocent. But thats my opinion.
-Toxic-
|
|
|
|
Post by Shady on Jun 10, 2005 22:47:55 GMT
Guilty. I wouldn't be surprised if he got away with it though.
|
|
|
|
Post by LazyBoy on Jun 10, 2005 22:51:34 GMT
he best not get away with it. Double standards are everywhere now days but if it comes to this then it proves that america is just a joke :/
|
|
|
|
Post by richndanapoint on Jun 11, 2005 2:46:47 GMT
Here's another issue with Jackson: he's already paid some kids millions of dollars to settle some abuse charges, so what is he doing still sleeping with children at his age? Odd at the most innocent level, and stupid at the most legal level.
|
|
|
|
Post by robbie on Jun 11, 2005 3:59:45 GMT
im sure he probably did it,but he will probably get off,because A.Hes a celebrity,and B. i believe there is some credibility issues with the accuser,and his family or something like that. so while my personal opinion says he is most likely guilty,i anticapate the jury either coming back not guilty or hung.
|
|
Evanescence
New Member
It is always to be taken for granted, that those who oppose an equality of rights never mean the exc
Posts: 10
|
Post by Evanescence on Jun 12, 2005 19:58:27 GMT
Personally, I think he's 100% innocent. His background is bad, but his dad was one messed up [no cussing on this site but you know what I mean]... And if you watched any biographies about him, his brothers and dad were messed up people, but he used abstinance and refused to the hookers thrown in his room... He's a celebrity.. which would be kind of stupid to screw his reputation that way... but you know.. some people are like that.. well, I'm the first to say he's innocent, and I hope at least one person will agree with me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Masked on Jun 12, 2005 21:25:52 GMT
I feel sorry for him... but I think he's guilty.
|
|
|
|
Post by robbie on Jun 14, 2005 4:59:01 GMT
the Jury came back with the verdict today,and found him....Not Guilty on all charges.
|
|
|
|
Post by LazyBoy on Jun 14, 2005 11:27:49 GMT
should trial him in the uk |
|
|
|
Post by FreeWill on Jun 14, 2005 16:02:45 GMT
I think he is guilty, but not with the kid who was the accuser in this trial..
|
|
|
|
Post by Shady on Jun 15, 2005 12:28:33 GMT
Might have been guilty with that kid, but there probably wasn't enough evidence. They were hardly the most trustworthy family.
|
|
|
|
Post by surfingusa9854 on Jun 16, 2005 23:46:15 GMT
I think he is guilty, but no way could they charge him that. As said above, he is a star and I don't think the accuser was credible, nor was there enough evidence.
I think that fans or haters of an accused being tried in court should be allowed to hang outside during the trial. That puts way too much pressure on the jurors. I have a feeling that may have been a contributor to the verdict in this case (which I most certainly find wrong). It saddens me that once more, our justice system has let a guilty man free. It saddens me even more that many parents will still allow their children to sleep with Michael Jackson.
|
|
